Cradle 2 the grave trailer soundtrack

Cradle 2 the grave trailer soundtrack However I do agree on that there perhaps should be a system where you press a small orange button next to the end turn button without listing you in the End turn queue. Instead, when everyone either ended their turn or pressed this orange button, the end will turn. A cradle 2 the grave trailer soundtrack popup on your screen or in the right down corner to say you will end your turn in 10 seconds because everyone is ready might be nice too. Or a simple pop-up which tells you that people are waiting for you to end your turn. Well, what I was suggesting was making the end turn button more of a ready for the next turn to begin button. It would basically give you a chance to both try to speed up the game and micromanage a few less crucial things. I should also point out that as it currently stands, players can still do things after they end their turn diplomacy and automating province production, for example. It s just a pain when everyone has ended their turn and there s 1 person holding it up, and everyone s stuck doing nothing. If you could still move units, you could occupy your time with little things like moving spy planes to better locations or shuffling the defenders of nearby cities. How bout you can move after end turn, but you can t attack? All your steel won t protect you if your will is weak. How about just a cancel end turn button that can be used only once, as to avoid spamming it? And nothing of value was lost. That s what I was getting at; being able to do little moves to fine tune things after ending your turn, but nothing major like attacking or building units It might be too hard to implement, but what if you could play normally after you end your turn, but as soon as everyone ends their turn, the turn will actually end. So, with 30 seconds left in the turn you click end turn, you realize you forgot to move some tanks, so you go to move them, while you re doing that everyone else ends their turn, and you don t get to complete your move. Or, if you manage to get the move down before everyone else ends, it will stand. In 2004, America Coming Together ACT made a big splash as one of the larger independent 527 committees set up to influence the presidential election. The organization was created and funded largely by wealthy donors and labor unions opposed to the reelection of George W. Bush and hoping to spend millions to influence the outcome. Though ACT ceased its political advocacy in 2005, a Center for Public Integrity analysis of political action committee filings part of an upcoming project focused on PAC spending habits discovered that the groups PAC is still alive and has spent nearly 8 million since the start of 200 It seemed more than a little bizarre. Not only did the reportedly shuttered organization still seem to be operating, it was one of the heaviest-spending committees over that period. Indeed, ACT was cradle 2 the grave trailer soundtrack of just 200 PACs to spend at least 75 million over the past three and a half years; more than 4, 000 others spent less than that. Whats going on? The answer provides an interesting window into the continuing fallout from the 2004 presidential election, even six years later. In the first presidential contest governed by the Bipartisan Campaign Reform Act of 2002 commonly known as McCain-Feingold, ACT and other so-called 527 committees spent millions of dollars to attempt to influence voters. ACT was particularly focused on get-out-the-vote efforts to help energize progressives to vote presumably for Democratic standard-bearer Sen. John Kerry Mass. These independent groups, which also included the conservative Swift Boat Veterans for Truth and the liberal Voter Fund, operated without clearly defined rules. Complaints were filed by those who felt ACT and other 527s had illegally exceeded campaign finance limits. The process was slow and dragged on until 2007, when the groups famously agreed to pay thousands of dollars in Federal Election Commission FEC fines. In the case of ACT, the organizations leaders opted to pay a whopping 775, 000 civil penalty rather than continue to fight what they feared would be an unending legal process. Because the FEC action was not settled until August of 2007, explains ACTs chief financial officer, Gary Gruber, the group was forced to maintain a political action committee even though it was no longer active. Beyond fines, the roughly 8 million was spent mostly on overhead and legal fees. Shortly after the FECs case was settled, unsuccessful independent presidential candidate Ralph Nader filed his own FEC complaint against ACT, the Democratic Party, Kerry and other groups he believed had unlawfully worked to deny him ballot access in the 2004 campaign. And, because of these new complaints, the PAC was again forced to stay open. Until the complaints were done, we couldnt pull the plug, Gruber told the Center. Former FEC Chairman Scott Thomas confirmed to the Center that this is correct; a PAC must receive permission from the commission before terminating and committees under investigation must remain open until their cases are closed. Naders grievance was finally dismissed in June of this year and the PAC now hopes it can finally shut its doors for good. Those doors, interestingly, are in office space at 1101 Vermont Ave. NW that the group rents from Catalist, a voter database company. Harold Ickes, a prominent former adviser to both Bill and Hillary Clinton and ACT organizer, is president of the company, and Gruber is its chief financial officer. ACT reports payments totaling 15, 000 to Catalist for its portion of the space since April 200 Using revenue from rentals of its voter lists, the PAC has taken in enough money to cover much of the 8 million it has spent. The PAC has not reported any political activities since 200 There is no purpose to the PAC anymore, Gruber notes.